.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

a better world?

Sunday, December 25, 2016

RE: Hubris from Hillary - Why Didn't She Pick Bernie!






first posted Nov 9th 2016


Election fraud is easier with a "close" race, & to overturn key results (if this could actually happen), all that is needed is the appearance of a close election (no matter that polls & maybe even exit polls showed Hillary Up, Not down), &  since a majority of red states have black box voting with no paper trail in some of Those... & last election 4 yrs ago Anonymous made a point of saying they had stopped an effort by Rovian forces to rig That election (probably why Rove was so shocked @ Obama Re election 4 yrs ago), but i have not yet heard of anonymous action in this election, (but wikileaks was used by anti-Hillary forces this yr)... &/or ALSO this being a vote against same sex marriage and liberal Scotus picks AND Mainly! >She should have picked Bernie for VP !!!




On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 10:24 PM,neocxn; wrote:
Reify the shrub or grounded shrub----which final version, that is the 
question?
How to Determine the final Selection. WE have the power to decide this 
election?
 
Molly Ivins persists in calling W "shrub". There actually is a symbol in 
botany to depict shrub and it looks a bit like the offspring of a question 
mark and the ankh, but instead of a period at the bottom, it just has a 
horizontal counterpart (just cross the "t") across the center of the 
vertical cross part.  I am not making this up!  Why have just an asterisk 
for Bush anyway?
 
Imagine, if you will, the Star of Islam inserted into the center of the 
crescent at the top of that dynastic shrub symbol, on top of the cross we 
all know and Love so much.  Two great tribes working together for the good 
of humankind.  Shrub the uniter?
 
There is another symbol in botany, looks like the shrub, but instead of just 
the cruciate undertow (do I hear crusade, people?+), the crescent has a 
"grounded cross" underneath -- the plus underlined with a definite minus, 
the more or less (depending on who you talk to), the surely not equal to -- 
and this symbol depicts "low shrub" -- I Kid You Not!  Look it up for 
yourself.  Shrub grounded.
 
Now try to imagine the Star of David in the middle of the Islamic crescent 
on the botanical shrub symbol, all over that old beloved cross.  This symbol 
could signify peace for the state of Israel amidst the crescent of Islamic 
peoples, anchored and supported by the Judeo-Christian spiritual values of 
mainstream America.  The new shrub symbol finally meaning something Good and 
Just by adding the Star of David, so that now all the great Abrahamic 
religions are united in one beautiful symbol!  Aum!  The shrub dynasty gives 
us a new way to look at the world.   Just take the ankh symbol and replace a 
Pi-shaped slice (from 6pm to 11pm on the loop above the cross) with the 
stars of  Islam and Israel (Singapore has 5 stars in it's crescent), and 
there you have it.  Just think of it.  I'm sure that these three great 
Abrahamic religions will Love to add just a little too, with a little 
adjustment to each of their respective symbols.  We would all simply be 
doing our part for world peace. Pay it forward now, people.  Just so long as 
the Christian right doesn't seize upon the symbol in an attempt to 
rescusitate a failing campaign.  What a way to show GW's self deprecating 
power to change the world.  Get yer gold pendants with a diamond for the 
star.  Reify the sacred shrub while you can!  The Star of Islam will be 
about as safe as the Baghdad Library in the hands of Chalabi.  Maybe no one 
will read this till after th`e`selection.
 
Oh, well, that is if there IS a selection (Check 
http://eatthestate.org/countdowntomartiallaw) -- or Bush 44 might just be a 
post script, a sort of asterisk in the low shrub symbol (say when Jeb-an 
even lower shrub--wins after his brothers second term - Check 
treblyou.FEMA.hurricane/slushfund)... funny, till you think about Bush 45.  
What comes after W?  P?  He'd be great, if he wasn't a partisan GOP and a 
Bush, or maybe because he is.  Think ready-roundup supershrub-but that's a 
different crusade.
 
end of synoptic version--please forward.
 
 
 
Long version: Debate 3 Burning Question?
 
I have a dream.  I have a dream for new symbolism of American leadership.  I 
have a dream for a new David Horsey cartoon, or one by any good political 
cartoonist as worthy as he.  Maybe Oliphant say, or Magruder or Trudeau.
 
Now that Bush 43 is 0 for 3 debate wise, and seeing as how both he and Kerry 
quoted the Bible in the recent debates, I think it is time to unveil a 
series of consistent symbols for the recent presidents (and future too?) 
that might just reveal a possible new way of looking at things (asterisk 
notwithstanding).
 
Imagine, if you will the question of mideast peace. What mideast peace you 
may well ask?  Well, it IS a big question mark.
 
In my mind, Clinton's tenure over mideast issues of war and peace could 
easily be reduced to this big question mark looking for answers.  Even 
Carter strived for a peace plan with the Camp David accords, but then sent 
troops to die trying to rescue U.S. embassy hostages held in Iran. The big 
Question no one talked about then?--Why were the U.S. hostages in Iran 
released only just after Carter left office?  The October surprise of arms 
for hostages Iran-contra deal did the trick.  this was cooked up by his CIA 
chief-none other than George H. w. Bush 41, who was also the then vice 
presidential candidate of the GOP (this would have made a good cartoon in 
and of itself).  Carter engineered his own demise and furthered a GOP 
dynasty, all just by appointing Bush 41 the DCI.  Porter Goss could do no 
better/worse, should he stay in office for a would be Kerry 44. .  Carter 
then lost to Reagan/Bush because he look! ed like a wimp in the mideast.     
Reagan sent in troops to die at a bunker in Beirut before his retreat-and 
then supplied a CIA backed Saddam with chemical weapons of mass destruction.
 
John Kerry also was big on questioning the wars of empire that the U.S. 
persists in.  Hence tossing his ribbons and those medals over the Nixon 
white house fence, or voting against the gulf war of the first president 
Bush 041. So this important.  Mark this question--did we really win that 
Desert Storm war with so many dead there (close to a million--including half 
a million children because of bombing, sanctions, and depleted uranium dust 
from exploded shells)?  If we did win that first Gulf War, then why attack 
again, and just what would losing have looked like? Might not that first 
Iraq war have just caused future fanatic blowback against the US?  Were we 
really ready for another generation of amputees, casualties and their dead 
brethren and all their potential terrorist friends and relatives (Bin Laden 
et al)?  Is it any wonder most people see US going the wrong direction?  Can 
this latest Iraq war be won?  Will this war be won any gooder as 043 might 
say?
 
Peace in the mideast, you say?  Which holy war is this, by the way?  Depends 
on who you talk to.  Jim Woolsey says we are now fighting World War 4.  They 
like to say Reagan won the cold war--WW3(for Woolsey War 3, it beats any oil 
war), and the Soviet Union was overextended in Afganistan too, but what 
really happened was the USSR simply folded under its national debt.  I 
thought Democrats won the debt race, what with the 5 trillion Clinton 
surplus.  But with our Debt Now Over 7 Trillion under Republican leadership, 
can we last much longer than the Sov's did?  Did we really win, or maybe it 
was a no-win situation what with all the dirty nuke material, and weapons of 
mass destruction all over the place-and now less secure than ever?
 
Now whatsis about symbolism, and what mideast peace are we talkin about?  
That's the big question.   Imagine, if you will the question mark itself and 
not only the mark, but the symbolism of it.  The visuals could be impressive 
here, in the hands of a good political cartoonist.  Combine the symbols for 
the two major religious factions at odds in the middle east, into a Question 
Mark. The arc of the question mark symbol could very easily be the crescent 
of Islam, by adding the 5-pointed star of Islam in the middle, and the 
period at the bottom could contain (or be instead) the 6-pointed Star of 
David, and the vertical (nearly exclamation mark shaped) stretch between 
might just as well symbolize the bandaid of American Diplomacy, trying to 
patch the two elements together, but not quite making it -- succeeding not, 
creating no real answers, just more questions!
 
Molly Ivins has a favorite and endearing handle for W(043), that actually 
has a symbol in botany to depict it!  It's true, look it up for yourself!  
She persists in calling him "shrub".  I am not making any of this up!  The 
botanical symbol for "shrub" looks sort of like a cross between the ankh and 
a question mark, but instead of a period at the bottom (so, no star of 
david?), it has a horizontal counterpart (just cross the "t" :+) across the 
center of the vertical bandaid part (the Neo-con addition to American 
diplomacy?+).  All well and good, so to speak, but I have something more to 
add.
 
I now believe (though it might be the converse) this symbol should depict 
his father Bush 041 better than him, as there is another symbol in botany, 
looks like shrub, but instead of just the cruciate undertow (do I hear 
crusade, people?+), the crescent has a "grounded cross" underneath -- the 
plus underlined with a definite minus, the more or less (depending on who 
you talk to), the surely not equal to -- and this symbol depicts "low shrub" 
-- I Kid You Not!  Look it up for yourself. (My friend Caroluna found these 
symbols in an old dictionary one day while we were sitting around in her 
kitchen-we talked about making T-shirts).
 
But it might all be great if the Muslims and the Anglo-Americans actually 
make democracy work in Iraq.  Imagine, if you will, the Star of Islam (in 
the center of the crescent on that dynastic shrub symbol), over the cross we 
all know and Love so much.  Two great tribes working together for the good 
of humankind.
 
Let's see:  39-bandaid, 40-period, 41-shrub, 42-question mark, 43-shrub-the 
lesser,  what next?  My favorite number is 4.  I grew up on 104th st, was 
engaged for a while to a woman with a 104 on her car license plate, and I 
even had a nostalgia for the 104th congress (it must have been her).  I was 
one of four brothers all born in Japan to Christian missionary parents.  
There are right now Christian missionaries in Iraq, trying to convert the 
heathens-er, moslums there. Whose Holy War is this, again?  Depends on who 
they say they talk with, Allah or Jesus.  Ex-CIA chief Woolsey says it is 
world war 4 (WORLD WAR $ with the caps on).  As long as it's not Euros.
 
I Happen to think that Kerry 44 might just be the real star -- a great 
American symbol of leadership for the whole world -- (easy compared to "low 
shrub").  If he can just finish what the shrubs started over there.
 
Now if you try hard to imagine it, you might just see the Star of David in 
the  middle of that Islamic crescent on the botanical shrub figure, all over 
the old beloved cross.  This symbol could signify the melting pot of U.S. 
spiritual values and the Kerry leadership that just might mean a just and 
rightful peace for so many, and peace for the state of Israel amidst the 
crescent of Islamic peoples, anchored and supported by the Judeo-Christian 
spiritual values of mainstream America.  The shrub symbol finally meaning 
something Good and Just by adding the Star of David, and now all the great 
Abrahamic religions united in one beautiful symbol!  The shrub dynasty gives 
us a new way to look at the world.  Just think of it.  I'm sure that these 
three great religions will love to add just a little too, with a little 
adjustment to each of their symbols.  Simply do our part for world peace. 
Pay it forward now, people.  Just as long as the Christian right doesn't 
seize upon the symbol in an attempt to resuscitate a failing campaign.  What 
a way to show GW's self deprecating power to change the world (forget 
T-shirts, think gold pendants with a diamond for the star).  Reify the 
sacred shrub while you still can!  The Star of Islam will be about as safe 
as the Baghdad Library in the hands of Chalabi.  Maybe no one will read this 
till after th`e`selection.
 
That actually is IF e`selection happens (google black box voting, or check 
out http://eatthestate.org/countdown to martial law) -- or Bush 44 might 
just be a post script, a sort of asterisk in the low shrub symbol (say when 
Jeb-an even lower shrub--wins the supreme court appointment after his 
brothers second term - Check treblyou.FEMA.hurricane/slushfund)... funny, 
till you think about Bush 45.  What comes after W?  P?  He'd be great, if he 
wasn't a partisan GOP and a Bush, or maybe because he is.  Think 
ready-roundup supershrub-but that 'selection is a different cartoon 
altogether.
 

Wednesday, May 22, 2013

Obama needs to downsize drones

Every Drone strike creates more fanatical enemies to the US than are killed. 
A no brainer as concerns blowback.
neocxn

Saturday, March 09, 2013

I wrote this before the o4 election

I wrote this before the o4 election, and now i guess we know who the grounded shrub is

10-14-04
(Obama added 11-4-08, in place of last top Dem.)

I have a dream. I have a dream of a new symbolism for American leadership. I have a dream for a new David Horsey cartoon, or one by any good political cartoonist as worthy as he (Trudeau, Magruder or Oliphant?).

Now that Bush 43 is 0 for 3 debate wise, and seeing as how both he and Kerry quoted the Bible in the recent debates, I think it is time to unveil a series of consistent symbols for the recent presidents (and future too?) that might just reveal a possible new way of looking at things (asterisk notwithstanding).

Imagine, if you will the question of mideast peace. What mideast peace you may well ask? Well, it IS a big question mark.

In my mind, Clinton's tenure over mideast issues of war and peace could easily be reduced to this big question mark looking for answers. Even Carter strove for a peace plan with the Camp David accords, but then sent troops to die trying to rescue U.S. embassy hostages held in Iran. The big Question no one talked about then?--Why were the U.S. hostages in Iran released only just after Carter left office? The October surprise of arms for hostages Iran-contra deal did the trick. this was cooked up by pres. Ford's ex CIA chief—none other than George H. w. Bush 41, who was also the then vice presidential candidate of the GOP (this would have made a good cartoon in and of itself). Carter might have incurred his own demise and furthered a GOP dynasty, all just by refusing to appoint Bush 41 the DCI like Bush had wanted. Carter then lost to Reagan/Bush because he looked like a wimp in the mideast, but Reagan just sent in troops to die at a bunker in Beirut before his retreat.

Kerry also was big on questioning the wars of empire that the U.S. persists in. Hence tossing his ribbons and those medals over the Nixon white house fence, or voting against the gulf war of the first president Bush 041. So this important. Mark this question--did we really win that Desert Storm war with so many dead there (close to a million--including half a million children because of bombing, sanctions, and depleted uranium dust from exploded shells)? If we did win that first Gulf War, then why attack again, and just what would losing have looked like? Might not that first Iraq war have just caused future fanatic blowback against the US? Were we really ready for another generation of amputees, casualties and their dead brethren and all their potential terrorist friends and relatives (Bin Laden et al)? Can this latest Iraq war be won? Will this war be won any gooder as (bush43 might say)?

Peace in the mideast, you say? Which holy war is this, by the way? Depends on who you talk to. Jim Woolsey says we are now fighting World War 4. They like to say Reagan won the cold war--WW3(for Woolsey War 3, it beats any old oil war), and the Soviet Union was overextended in Afganistan too, but what really happened was the USSR simply folded under its national debt. I thought Democrats won the debt race, what with the 5 trillion Clinton surplus. But with our Debt Now Over 10 Trillion under Republican leadership, can we last much longer than the USSR did? Did we really win, or maybe it was a no-win situation what with all the dirty nuke material, and weapons of mass destruction all over the place—and now less secure than ever?

Now whatsis about symbolism, and what mideast peace are we talkin about? That's the big question. Imagine, if you will the question mark itself and not only the mark, but the symbolism of it. The visuals could be impressive here, in the hands of a good political cartoonist. Combine the symbols for the two major religious factions at odds in the middle east, into a Question Mark. The arc of the question mark symbol could very easily be the crescent of Islam, by adding the 5-pointed star of Islam in the middle, and the period at the bottom could contain (or be instead) the 6-pointed Star of David, and the vertical (nearly exclamation mark shaped) stretch between might just as well symbolize the bandaid of American Diplomacy, trying to patch the two elements together, but not quite making it -- succeeding not, creating no real answers, just more questions!

Molly Ivins had a favorite and endearing handle for W(43), that actually has a symbol in botany to depict it! It's true, look it up for yourself! She persists in calling him "shrub". I am not making any of this up! The botanical symbol for "shrub" looks sort of like a question mark, but instead of a period at the bottom (so, no star of david?), it has a horizontal counterpart (just cross the "t" :+) across the center of the vertical bandaid part (the Neo-con addition to American diplomacy?+). All well and good, so to speak, but I have something more to add.

I now believe (though it might be the converse) this symbol should depict his father (Bush 041) better than him, as there is another symbol in botany, looks like shrub, but instead of just the cruciate undertow (do I hear crusade, people?+), the crescent has a "grounded cross" underneath -- the plus underlined with a definite minus, the more or less (depending on who you talk to), the surely not equal to -- and this symbol depicts "low shrub" -- I Kid You Not! Look it up for yourself. (My friend Carol found these symbols in an old dictionary one day and we imagined them on a teashirt). But it might all be great if the Muslims and the Anglo-Americans actually make democracy work in Iraq. Imagine, if you will, the Star of Islam (in the center of the crescent on that dynastic shrub symbol), over the cross we all know and Love so much. Two great tribes working together for the good of humankind.

Let's see: 39-bandaid, 40-period, 41-shrub, 42-question mark, 43-low shrub, what next? There are right now Christian missionaries in Iraq, trying to convert the heathens—er, moslums there. Then whose Holy War is this, again? Depends on who they say they talk with, Allah or Jesus. Woolsey says it is world war 4 (WORLD WAR $ with the caps on). As long as it's not Euros.

I Happen to think that Qbama 44 might just be a real star -- a great American symbol of leadership for the whole world -- (easy compared to "low shrub"). If he can just finish what the shrubs started over there.

Now if you try hard to imagine it, you might just see the Star of David in the middle of that Islam crescent of the shrub, over the old beloved cross. This symbol would signify the melting pot of U.S. spiritual values and the Obama leadership that just might mean a just and rightful peace for so many, and peace for the state of Israel amidst the crescent of Islamic peoples, anchored and supported by the Judeo-Christian spiritual values of mainstream America. The shrub symbol finally meaning something Good and Just by adding the Star of David, and all the great Abrahamic religions united in one symbol! The shrub dynasty gives us a new way to look at the world. Just think of it. I'm sure that these three great religions will be happy to add just a little too, with each of their symbols. Simply do their part for world peace. Pay it forward, now.
Think roundup-ready supershrub—but that's another cartoon.

neocxn

about Romney's latest interview




from a post by "this is a test" on the Seattle Times article,




http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/reader_feedback/public/display.php?source_id=2020481391&source_name=mbase&offset=20

 "pugnus populi said about Romney's latest interview:


7. He picked Ryan
Yup, that was a spectacularly bad choice.

6. He was hawkish on Iran
Yup.

5. He totally blew debates 2 & 3 & sitting there with a sick look while being shredded by Obama
And debate #1.

4. He gave Obama a pass on Benghazi
Pure BS. An absolute non issue that the amerika people thought far less of the rethuglicans than obummer. Kinda like the clinton impeachment thang.

3. His idiotic 47 percent remark
Yeah, that was classic, job well done. Way to go mittens.

2. He couldn't explain Mormonism to the American people
No one can. It's an insane delusional cult. Same as every other religion.

1. Hurricane Sandy
Nope. Any sitting prez gets pub for dealing with disasters as they arise, unless they obviously caused them, like say iraq & shrub.   

The truth is:
There is no functional difference between mittens & obummer. All you disappointed rethuglican voters should be heartened that the winner is virtually identical to your candidate. If you exercise your senses and evaluate the evidence, you will see for all practical purposes, your candidate won.

The right wingnuts couldn't tell a right wing from a leftist if they fell down a flight of stairs.

We live in a fascist corporate controlled state, where the public is deluded and indoctrinated by the state/corporate propaganda, and all the rubes cheer USA! USA! on command.

There is no difference between the rethuglicans and the democorps. They are 2 sides of the same bitcoin. Both wholly owned by the ruling oligarchy. Both only representing the interests of the top one tenth of one percent that eff over this benighted land. Anyone who can not see this is fully propagandized. The 2 parties only pretend to differ at the margins to keep 'their bases' occupied. On any question that really matters to the public, or the world, they are identical. Anyone who calls obummer a socialist is a laughingly stupid drooling idiot. obummer is a right wing tool of wall street, the military-security complex, big pharma, fossil fuels, etc etc ad naseum.

The policies of the government are designed to transfer the public's wealth to the ruling one tenth of one percent. The endless "war on terror". The endless "war on drugs". The endless "war on civil liberties". The surveillance state. The private-for-profit prisons industry. We live in a land where justice is a game. Watch out or get hauled before a grand jury, maybe sit in solitary with no books nor writing materials for 24 hours a day for 18 months for "contempt". You might have given "material aid" to a "terrorist organization". Ha! LOL. What a pathetic joke. "Greatest country on earth(tm)" LOL. We so desperately need a revolution in this country.

Fight The Power. We Must All Sacrifice Ourselves, or it'll be too late. If it isn't already."

Sunday, November 18, 2012

hacker-group-anonymous-opisrael-downs-hundreds-israeli-websites

http://www.examiner.com/article/hacker-group-anonymous-opisrael-downs-hundreds-israeli-websites

Rovian etch-a-sketch vote machine network thwarted by Anon

@StephenAtHome Rovian etch-a-sketch vote machine network
 thwarted by Anon hackers using OZ to counter ORCA,
 http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021832154
[tweet https://twitter.com/Neocxn/status/270035016258576384]

Friday, November 16, 2012

if ya clutching vulture capital to buy votes, the MittsFits



Anyway, at first i thought "now that Romney has been hung out to dry on the crooked cross
 of properly tithed vulture capital, that's that". Then i started thinking how Romney's
 family and Bain business associates have been investing in etch-a-sketch
voting machine companies, and how 50 million is WAY more than i thought could
ever stomach voting for the mittsfits! Someone should tally and compare numbers
of actual registered voters vs total votes in each of those red & getting redder counties,
to see if anyone reprogrammed a little too ... well, enthusiastically, ('liberally'
 not quite the right word here), as these red areas
ALL seem to begin to get redder since... etch-a-skech voting machines appeared!
Like so 21st century, man
neocxn

Monday, October 22, 2012

"Close" vote Enables electronic voting machine fraud

Willlard:  Hung out to dry as a washed up neocon on the crooked cross of vulture capitalism?
Cllear Chanel owned by Bain is 1400  stations, thousands of billboards!
Corporate polling may mask vote machine fraud as media misinformation is the key. 
Fraud is easier to perpetrate in a so called "close" race, just need the appearances, so 
Mitt has well named it, BLINDERS FOR THE WOMEN and everyone else too.

BLINDERS for the Women

A big issue this election season as always is media mis- Information.
Clear Chanel 1400 stations owned by Bain and thousands of billboards, too. ...
Might as well name it, BLINDERS FOR THE WOMEN and everyone else too.
neocxn

Saturday, September 27, 2008

Eagle-eye rates high, yet no exposure

I just watched an amazing action movie, almost sci-fi, called Eagle-eye, but noticed my local weaklies did not mention a word of the movie, very downplayed, had to search to find it. Maybe it is just too hysteria inducing, so possibly just as well.
GREAT Movie, though, and I will see it again soon, too. It had an appropriate setting for the climax, especially due to the crucial nature of the negotiations at the Capitals this weekend.
Keep another eye out for the sequel, ATM hal.9-9000 OR banks with extra.0's?

neocx

Thursday, January 18, 2007

will dems have what it takes to stop the war?

De-funding this war is the most important thing they can do.
Please urge your politicians to support the initiative to de-fund the war,
and rescind congressional authorization for Bushwar.
neocxn

Monday, December 04, 2006

will democratic leaders have enough courage

The war in Iraq is only over if the US stops funding it, so the
congressional leadership needs to reach out to their receptive
counterparts on the minority side to achieve a vetoproof supermajority
and defund the war profiteers.

The Soviet Union folded due to bancruptcy from their war costs in that
region. the US is on the verge of following the same path.

neocxn